business · SCMP

Evergrande Liquidators Challenge SFC's HK$1 Billion PwC Settlement

about 2 hours ago2 MIN
Evergrande Liquidators Challenge SFC's HK$1 Billion PwC Settlement

Summary

Hong Kong's Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) has defended a landmark HK$1 billion (US$128 million) settlement with accounting firm PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) Hong Kong, which sits at the heart of an auditing scandal involving indebted developer China Evergrande Group. The liquidators of the failed developer are challenging the agreement in the High Court, arguing the regulator abused its powers when it secured compensation for minority shareholders without going through the courts.

Key Points

  • In a judicial review hearing on Wednesday, SFC lawyers urged the High Court to dismiss the challenge brought by Evergrande liquidators Tiffany Wong Wing-sze and Edwin (surname truncated in source)
  • PwC Hong Kong agreed in April to set aside HK$1 billion to compensate Evergrande's minority shareholders without admitting liability for alleged breaches of professional duties
  • This marked the first time the SFC disposed of an alleged breach under section 213 of the Securities and Futures Ordinance through a settlement without seeking court orders
  • The liquidators are separately seeking 57 billion yuan (US$8.4 billion) from three PwC entities in what could become one of Hong Kong's largest corporate lawsuits
  • SFC lawyers argued the regulator has broad statutory powers to settle disciplinary actions and a duty to protect independent investors' interests

Why It Matters

The case tests whether Hong Kong's market regulator can bypass judicial oversight when negotiating settlements with auditing firms, potentially setting a precedent for how regulatory enforcement powers are exercised in future financial scandals. The outcome could affect how thousands of minority shareholders recover losses from corporate collapses, particularly in cross-border cases involving mainland Chinese developers with significant Hong Kong listings.
The case tests whether Hong Kong's market regulator can bypass judicial oversight when negotiating settlements with auditing firms, potentially setting a precedent for how regulatory enforcement powers are exercised in future financial scandals. The outcome could affect how thousands of minority shareholders recover losses from corporate collapses, particularly in cross-border cases involving mainland Chinese developers with significant Hong Kong listings.