Jing Tian's Data Vanishes from Chinese Platforms Amid Sun Yuchen Dispute
SingTao · 2 SOURCESabout 2 hours ago5 MIN
Summary
Chinese actress Jing Tian (景甜), 38, finds herself at the center of a swirling controversy involving financial disputes and privacy revelations with wealthy businessman Sun Yuchen (孫宇晨). Sun published a lengthy essay titled "My Girlfriend Jing Tian," exposing intimate details and claiming a surrogacy agreement existed. He subsequently filed a lawsuit seeking 30 million RMB (approximately 35.04 million HKD) in returned betrothal gifts. While Jing Tian's social media following unexpectedly grew by over 240,000 in one week, her platform data suddenly vanished, sparking speculation about potential industry blacklisting similar to previously sanctioned "morally corrupt artists."
Key Points
- Sun Yuchen filed a lawsuit demanding Jing Tian and her parents return 30 million RMB in betrothal gifts, alleging a surrogacy agreement and claiming she demanded 50 million USD before a procedure
- Searches for "Jing Tian" on WeChat Index temporarily displayed "no data available," and her name disappeared from celebrity ranking lists
- Meituan, which appointed Jing Tian as brand ambassador in mid-August, deleted cooperative posts and removed offline promotional posters
- Bilibili removed discussion videos about the controversy, citing failure to pass content review for "social hotspot topics"
- Legal experts argue the case constitutes a civil dispute rather than criminal misconduct, suggesting official bans would be premature before court rulings
Why It Matters
This incident highlights how celebrity controversies in mainland China can trigger rapid platform-level responses before any legal determination. The case demonstrates the precarious position of entertainers caught in public disputes, where social media data can be unilaterally cleared and endorsement deals evaporate overnight based on perceived public sentiment rather than judicial findings .
This incident highlights how celebrity controversies in mainland China can trigger rapid platform-level responses before any legal determination. The case demonstrates the precarious position of entertainers caught in public disputes, where social media data can be unilaterally cleared and endorsement deals evaporate overnight based on perceived public sentiment rather than judicial findings .