Submission attacks UK Hong Kong report as interference
HK01 · 1 SOURCES1 day ago2 MIN
Summary
A commentary article carried by HK01 on October 26 criticised the British government’s “Hong Kong Six-Monthly Report: January to June 2026” and described it as politically motivated interference in China’s internal affairs. The piece said the Legislative Council strongly opposed the report and supported the Hong Kong SAR government’s formal rebuttal. It argued that after the 1997 handover, Hong Kong’s constitutional basis rests on the Constitution of the People’s Republic of China and the Basic Law, not the Sino-British Joint Declaration as a basis for British oversight. The article also defended Hong Kong’s national security laws, judicial handling of major cases, media environment and post-2021 electoral system as part of a transition from instability to governance and development
Key Points
- The article said Britain’s report covered January to June 2026 and made what it called false allegations on national security laws, court cases, press freedom and elections
- It argued Britain’s rights and obligations under the Sino-British Joint Declaration were fully discharged when China resumed sovereignty over Hong Kong in 1997
- The commentary said the National Security Law and the Safeguarding National Security Ordinance restored order after prolonged unrest involving arson, road blockades and attacks on citizens
- It cited economic indicators including Fraser Institute recognition as the world’s freest economy, global competitiveness ranked second, and HK$388 billion in IPO fundraising in the first three quarters of 2026
- The piece defended the handling of the Jimmy Lai case and the Hong Kong Alliance case, saying courts acted on evidence, law and procedure without retroactive punishment
Why It Matters
The article sets out a strongly pro-establishment rebuttal to British criticism and frames the dispute as one over sovereignty, legal authority and the meaning of “one country, two systems”. For Hong Kong readers, it reinforces the official argument that security legislation and electoral restructuring are central to stability, economic confidence and the city’s current governance model