CUHK Professor Faces Backlash Over Sexist Remarks, Issues Formal Apology
HKFP · 2 SOURCES1 day ago2 MIN
Summary
An economics professor at the Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK) has issued a formal apology after facing intense criticism for remarks about women and marriage during a campus talk, with an online petition calling for his suspension gathering nearly 100 signatures. Terence Chong Tai-leung, associate head of New Asia College, made controversial statements during a biweekly college assembly on September 22, 2026, suggesting female students should look for wealthy husbands rather than pursue PhDs. The petition, started by a concern group formed after the incident, has demanded Chong's removal from his post and stronger vetting procedures for guest speakers. Chong posted his apology on his personal Facebook page on September 29, stating he deeply respected women and believed men and women were equally important in society.
Key Points
- Terence Chong Tai-leung delivered a talk titled "How to invest in your life?" at New Asia College's biweekly assembly on September 22
- During the talk, Chong used the phrase "women fishing for a golden tortoise," a Chinese euphemism for seeking a rich partner, and suggested women should find wealthy husbands while young instead of pursuing PhDs
- A presentation slide displayed the text: "The cost-benefit [analysis] of girls fishing for a golden tortoise"
- As of September 28, the petition had over 80 signatories from students and alumni, growing to nearly 100 by September 29
- The petition demands Chong's suspension and permanent removal from his role as associate college head, citing damage to the college's image and reversal of gender equality efforts
Why It Matters
The controversy underscores ongoing tensions between traditional gender expectations and modern equality movements in Hong Kong's academic institutions. The incident has reignited debates about academic freedom, appropriate conduct for educators, and institutional responsibility in preventing gender stereotyping on campus. The strong response from students and alumni signals growing intolerance for remarks that many view as objectifying women, particularly in educational settings that should promote gender equity.
The controversy underscores ongoing tensions between traditional gender expectations and modern equality movements in Hong Kong's academic institutions. The incident has reignited debates about academic freedom, appropriate conduct for educators, and institutional responsibility in preventing gender stereotyping on campus. The strong response from students and alumni signals growing intolerance for remarks that many view as objectifying women, particularly in educational settings that should promote gender equity.