Property Management Firm Holds Another Special Owners' Meeting Amid Contract Dispute
On.cc · 1 SOURCESabout 2 hours ago6 MIN
Summary
Ho On Management Limited, the court manager appointed for Hung Fuk Court (宏福苑) in Tai Po, held another special owners' meeting on Wednesday evening (September 2, 2026) at four venues simultaneously, including Tin Shui Wai Community Hall. Shuttle buses were arranged to transport residents to the meetings, with the first bus arriving at Tin Shui Wai venue around 6:30 pm. The meeting addressed contract matters and insurance renewal issues, though some residents expressed dissatisfaction with the timing and content of the proceedings.
Key Points
- The special owners' meeting took place at four locations: Tai Po, Kai Tak, Aberdeen, and Tin Shui Wai Community Hall, starting at 7 pm with registration from 5 pm
- A shuttle bus carrying three residents arrived at Tin Shui Wai Community Hall around 6:30 pm, with similar arrangements made for Kai Tak venue
- Mr. Ho (何先生), a resident from Kai Tak, stated he had already selected his replacement unit, noting the government had arranged everything including acquisition proposals and unit options
- Mr. Pan (潘先生), a resident of Hung Chi Kok (宏志閣), left the meeting midway, describing the proceedings as focused on contract matters with no special content, adding that owners had no real choice
- Ho On announced during the meeting that residents could recover up to HK$6,000 in funds, while also addressing insurance renewal for Hung Chi Kok that sparked owner protests
- Mr. Pan accused Ho On of deliberately scheduling the meeting after residents signed contracts on Monday (August 31), suggesting the firm intended to avoid substantive discussion on property rights issues
Why It Matters
The timing and structure of this meeting highlight ongoing tensions between property management and residents during a major urban renewal process. The allegation that Ho On held discussions only after residents committed to contracts raises questions about transparency and the ability of owners to participate meaningfully in decisions affecting their homes. As similar acquisition and resettlement processes continue across Hong Kong, the handling of these meetings may set precedents for how residents are engaged in major redevelopment projects .
The timing and structure of this meeting highlight ongoing tensions between property management and residents during a major urban renewal process. The allegation that Ho On held discussions only after residents committed to contracts raises questions about transparency and the ability of owners to participate meaningfully in decisions affecting their homes. As similar acquisition and resettlement processes continue across Hong Kong, the handling of these meetings may set precedents for how residents are engaged in major redevelopment projects .